pages_show_blog_post_wide
Other kinds of pages: http://www.parklandinstitute.ca/a_time_for_vision
http://www.parklandinstitute.ca/a_time_for_vision?recruiter=
begin include: _nav
end include: _nav
1-column layout

A Time for Vision

A Sustainable and Equitable Economy

Executive summary

A Time for Vision

The April 2005 Alberta budget will be the first since the province declared the debt eliminated. It’s time for a bold vision, and this budget should lay the fiscal foundations for realizing that vision. The 2005 Throne Speech promises that All Albertans will share in the Alberta Advantage. To ensure this, we must collectively commit to building a socially sustainable and equitable economy.

In this document, we touch on some fiscal highlights to demonstrate that there are no economic obstacles to realizing such a vision. While we applaud some of the initiatives promised in the Throne speech, such as the promised increases to minimum wage, AISH, and funding for post secondary education, we show that these steps barely make up for many years of cuts and erosion by inflation. These are just quick fixes: minimum one-time increases that do not address the long-term problems and inequities in the province.

Alberta has experienced very strong growth, providing an excellent opportunity to lead the country in sustainability and equity. However, the benefits are not being shared equally. Poverty indicators such as food bank usage and homelessness have continued their upward trends, increasing by over 11% over the past year. To reverse this polarization, the budget will need to be based on a comprehensive long-term plan that includes deeper investments in key areas.

Revenues

On the revenue side, there has been a continued shift away from reliable funds and a progressive taxation system toward reliance on regressive taxes such as gambling and consumption taxes, as well as health premiums. Unnecessarily low royalty rates and the lack of savings in the Heritage Fund also indicate a lack of concern for the future.

Expenditures

On the expenditure side we discuss spending trends in education, health and social programs.

Education

For the K to 12 education system there has yet to be any significant funding allocated for implementation of the Learning Commission’s recommendations beyond class size. This applies to areas such as kindergarten, junior kindergarten, libraries and technology. For post secondary education, we assess the recently announced one-year funded tuition freeze and new endowment against prior funding cuts and the needs of the system. We find the new funding initiatives to be inadequate. While these provide additional grant and loan support for students struggling under debt loads, and funds for new research initiatives, what is really needed is new core funding for the institutions themselves.

Health Care

In health care we identify that spending is not rising out of control but is steady in proportion to GDP. However, the area where costs are rising most is in the category with the most private sector involvement. In spite of this, the government continues to focus on privatization at the expense of cost effectiveness, knowing that it is cheaper to deliver the same services in the public sector. Another area deserving of more attention is the social determinants of health. The government needs to recognize the integration of all programs and the importance of poverty and inequality to health care.

Social Assistance

Social assistance rates fall far short of the poverty line. This is another area that has yet to recover from the cuts of the 90s. In addition, the rates have been eroded significantly by inflation. Between 1993 and 2004 inflation totalled 27%. AISH rates, on the other hand, increased by only four percent and benefits for families received only a one-time increase of $20. In Alberta, supports received by a single employable person and a person with a disability are among the lowest in the country, and those for a single parent with one child are the lowest.

Wages and Working Conditions

The provincial government recently made a commitment to increase the minimum wage from the lowest minimum wage in the country at $5.90 per hour to close to average at $7.00 per hour. It has not yet been decided how or when this increase will be implemented. The increase barely compensates for inflation over the last five years, when the last increase took place. If implemented in full, immediately, it amounts to an increase of 17 cents an hour after inflation.

Increasing the rate every five years or so when the pressure becomes too great is not good for business or for those working for minimum wage. With proper policy, this kind of shock effect would not be necessary.

A New Vision for Alberta

Shifting to a sustainable, equitable economy

Alberta should be leading the country in more than GDP growth and employment. We should be setting an example by creating a comprehensive long-term plan that ensures the highest possible quality of life for all Albertans.

To this end we suggest a number of examples of changes the government could make to reverse the trends toward polarization and guarantee the highest quality of life for all, including future generations. Some examples include:

  • Reinstate a progressive tax system and eliminate health premiums, and introduce measures to reduce revenues from gambling and consumption taxes.
  • Increase all social assistance rates to above the poverty line and index them to inflation or peg them to the Low Income Cut Off rates. 
  • Raise the minimum wage to $10.00 per hour across the province and index it to inflation. 
  • Introduce benefits for part time workers. 
  • Commit adequate funding to implement all of the Learning Commission’s recommendations, including those for kindergarten and junior kindergarten programs. 
  • Eliminate tuition fees at all Alberta universities and colleges and increase base operating grants for universities and colleges to compensate. 
  • Forgive student debt and provide interest-free loans to all Alberta post-secondary students.

Can Alberta afford these changes?

Most of the surplus is from selling off our natural capital and the bulk of those revenues should be used to secure a future beyond fossil fuels. For this reason, we recommend returning to a progressive tax system and reinstating corporate taxes to prior rates to fund our recommendations.

  • Returning corporate income tax rates to the 2002 rate of 15 % would generate 855 million more - enough to cover almost the full cost of eliminating all health care premiums.
  • Paying off the debt has freed 363 million in annual servicing costs enough to cover the cost of providing free tuition to all Albertans.
  • Returning to a progressive tax system just at the rates that were in place in 2001 would make over $1 billion annually - enough to cover providing a minimum income for all Albertans.

Planning for the future beyond fossil fuels

To guarantee a future, we need to maximize the rents received from our fossil fuels: royalty rates need to increase. The province also needs to develop a clear strategy for both savings and investments that will build a diverse, sustainable economy for the future.

ISBN: 1-894949-06-4

Related reading

Get timely research and analysis from Parkland in your inbox.

Subscribe to email from Parkland

Your donation supports research for the common good.

Donate to Parkland Institute
end include: pages_show_blog_post_wide